Mediumhero

Amazing! This is the holy grail of Canucks collections!

HUGE thanks to islesfan25 (Josh) for being the middle man and helping me get a jersey from eBay! It arrived quickly and without issue.

I noticed three in the store last time I went there (a 1.0 and 2.0 retail and a 58+ 2.0) but its too bad they don't have more stock of them.

Did they have any blank authentics, team issued or retail? I wanted to go but I had to work.

Got a Canucks 95-97 alternate 'salmon skate' replica coming in soon and was debating between Bure #96 with the A or a Naslund first year #22, was just looking for some feedback and thoughts?

Looking for pre-2000 Canucks jerseys in size 48 OR the KOHO gradient jersey, also 48. Blank or well known players preferred, but not mandatory.

Anyone happen to have a 54 1.0 vs 56 2.0 OR 50 2.0 vs 56 2.0?

Doesn't ship to Canada :///. Can anyone help me out with this?

Never mind (for now)

A small, unimpressive Canucks haul from the last little while. First up the one I'm most excited about, a 1.0 third. I have been looking for an authentic third for a long time now and I finally found one for a great price. Now I'm debating whether to strip it and make it a Hamhuis, but my goalie guilt is taking over. This thing has tents for sleeves and its only a 48 A more reasonably sized 48. Will be getting a 25th anniversary patch And this ones a bit interesting. Replica, but it feels so much lighter and thinner than any other NHL branded Premier that I have, as well as the shoulder patches, which are also thinner than the NHL ones, and also feature a much darker green on them. Could be a one season wonder with the Heat disbanding and Calgary looking to move the affiliate to NY state... Don't know if the inaugural season and New York State Tool patches will ever be available but if anyone knows where to get them, please let me know.

Never heard of or seen a 64 before. Is it just another way of expressing a goalie cut? http://www.ebay.ca/itm/Practice-Authentic-Pro-Stock-Montreal-Canadiens-Hockey-NHL-Jersey-Size-64-/141249454436?pt=U_Hockey_Fan_Shop&hash=item20e31fa164&_uhb=1

'Wild wing' that also doubles as a chiropractic business card: http://www.ebay.ca/itm/Vtg-90s-ANAHEIM-MIGHTY-DUCKS-Mesh-Hockey-Jersey-Mens-M-nhl-sweater-wild-wing-/360894521196?&_trksid=p2056016.l4276

I can see how the word mark/vector thing would be an issue, it would be for me. But Hamhuis DID wear a vector 2.0 with the Nucks, so that just makes it an issue of jersey material, really.

Well I'm not TOO bothered by it, a little but not much, but I don't want to do it if it's a major foul.

Got a Canucks quandary here. Would it be considered a major foul to put the name of a player who, as far as I can tell, never wore a Reebok 1.0, on a 1.0? I'm referring specifically to Hamhuis, as everything I can gather suggests the Canucks never wore the 1.0 during his time here (since 2010).