Question for the Rangers jersey experts
#1
Posted 25 October 2009 - 05:44 PM
Please let me know,
Thanks.
#4
Posted 26 October 2009 - 07:05 AM
That being said, just because the Rangers haven't changed their style, that unfortunately doesn't mean there aren't places that still get it wrong. I have 3 Shannahan Rangers jerseys that are all wrong in one way or another (two have the wrong font for the name, evident by looking at the "A"s and another has the wrong number font, by looking at the "4").
The three places I know get it right (and I'm sure there are others) are: IceJerseys, EPS, and Pro-Jerseys
Looking at the Kovalev you show there, it looks correct. The "A" is the right one and everything else looks good.
#5
Posted 26 October 2009 - 08:13 AM
akteon, on Oct 26 2009, 08:05 AM, said:
That being said, just because the Rangers haven't changed their style, that unfortunately doesn't mean there aren't places that still get it wrong. I have 3 Shannahan Rangers jerseys that are all wrong in one way or another (two have the wrong font for the name, evident by looking at the "A"s and another has the wrong number font, by looking at the "4").
The three places I know get it right (and I'm sure there are others) are: IceJerseys, EPS, and Pro-Jerseys
Looking at the Kovalev you show there, it looks correct. The "A" is the right one and everything else looks good.
Thank you very much. That helps a lot.
#6
Posted 26 October 2009 - 08:43 AM
#8
Posted 26 October 2009 - 11:21 AM
Thanks again everybody and if there is something wrong with the kit please post.
#9
Posted 26 October 2009 - 11:34 AM

Hard to explain the difference but if you look closely you'll see it. Check out the white part that makes a shape like this...
___
/ \
The older version looks like this....
___
l l
It's a VERY small detail, but something I noticed when I got my Leetch '94 Cup jersey done.
#11
Posted 26 October 2009 - 12:33 PM
#12
Posted 26 October 2009 - 12:44 PM
irishlaxburger2, on Oct 26 2009, 12:34 PM, said:
Wow definitely a good catch on that, I stand corrected. I was too busy looking at the inner 2 not the outline.
Not something I'd personally worry about, but definitely something I never noticed.
#13
Posted 26 October 2009 - 12:53 PM
irishlaxburger2, on Oct 26 2009, 12:37 PM, said:
I think I see what your saying. The part that goes up on a 45 degree angle should be a 90 degree angle on the older jerseys. If so I can just trim the twill a little to make it 90 degrees.
P.S. I forgot to mention gamedays site does not have pictures of the kits they make for each individual year. If the style is pretty much the same they'll just have one picutre and label it an 89-98 for example. There 1994 kit very well may have the proper two and the one I posted might be from a later year. I won't know for sure until I contact them.
#14
Posted 26 October 2009 - 01:01 PM
TMLFAN, on Oct 26 2009, 01:53 PM, said:
Exactly, and that's what I did with my Leetch jersey. It could've came out a bit nicer, but oh well. I'm happy with it.
The 2 is the only number I've seen them change in the last 20 or so years though, and it's such a minuscule change. If you're going with Messier, you should be fine.
#15
Posted 26 October 2009 - 01:08 PM
irishlaxburger2, on Oct 26 2009, 02:01 PM, said:
The 2 is the only number I've seen them change in the last 20 or so years though, and it's such a minuscule change. If you're going with Messier, you should be fine.
true, I wasn't even thinking. I won't even have to worry about that because I'll only be using 1's for Messier.

Sign In
Register
Help


MultiQuote



